Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates ![]() Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 19:50:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Plegadis
Info created by Chuck Homler - uploaded by Chuck Homler - nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Support There are no FP's of this species. -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Quality is nowhere near FP-level. I suggest you withdraw this nomination. Wolverine XI 21:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you provide more specific feedback? What about the image is problematic? Needsmoreritalin (talk) 23:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Support I strongly disagree. --Zzzs (talk) 21:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you remind me when I asked for your opinion? Thanks. Wolverine XI 22:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you please try to avoid escalating this into uncivil territory? I'm only replying because you mentioned that this image has terrible quality, which I disagree with. Additionally, you didn't specify why you think the image has poor quality. The nomination is currently passing in QIC, so I'm confused about why you believe this image has terrible quality. Zzzs (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you remind me when I asked for your opinion? Thanks. Wolverine XI 22:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 17:14:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1940-1949
Info created by Russell Lee - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment Little bit of an odd image for here: I'd say it's oddly composed but very compelling. Passed En-wiki FPC easily. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:17, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 14:50:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
Info created by Rangan Datta Wiki - uploaded by Rangan Datta Wiki - nominated by Rangan Datta Wiki -- Rangan Datta Wiki (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Rangan Datta Wiki (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2024 at 17:30:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 17:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 17:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Neutral No wow. ★ 17:05, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2024 at 15:01:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Palácio do Planalto - uploaded by Luiz79 - nominated by ★ -- ★ 15:01, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 15:01, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Neutral no wow and Tokenism --Wilfredor (talk) 01:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2024 at 06:04:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States (this gallery has sections for states, but there is currently none for the state in which this image was taken: North Carolina)
Info created by AHeneen - uploaded by AHeneen - nominated by AHeneen -- AHeneen (talk) 06:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support as creator & nominator. There is a lot of detail in this image, but when viewed at 100% zoom, the sharpness should be OK. In my browser, the "original image" link on its page defaults to a much higher zoom (200%???) in which the sharpness of the trees is not the greatest. The rock face on the left foreground is naturally wet year-round and had a trickle of running water behind a layer of ice, which is why some of the ice against the rock face is dark while icicles hanging close to the rock face are bright from the sunlight shining through them. Image was taken in Nikon RAW format and only editing adjustments were to increase both highlight and shadow protection, increase overall brightness just a little, increase saturation just a little, and change white balance from "auto" to "natural light auto". -- AHeneen (talk) 06:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Weak
Support Really good composition. The sharpness could be better (f/8?) and a touch of CAs. --XRay 💬 11:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Composition, light, and mood. – Aristeas (talk) 17:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 20:09, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Question Very good composition. But I think it is over-sharpened. Is this intentional? --August (talk) 20:39, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Neutral A tad oversharpened. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 18:12:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece
Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 18:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- The byzantine church of Saints Sergius and Bacchus near Kitta, Mani, Greece.
Support -- C messier (talk) 18:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice angle. ★ 22:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 17:28:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- View of Kavousi, the modern village down the valley, and Azorias, the ancient town lying in ruins on top of the hill to the right, in Eastern Crete, Greece.
Support -- C messier (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 16:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 13:11:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info Gephan range on the right bank of the Bhaga River reflected in Gemoor Khar pond, Gemur, Lahaul, Himachal, India. Elevation 3,210 m (10,530 ft). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support I like the contrast between the reflective water and matte algae. -- Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 01:35, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 11:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 22:26, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:38, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 16:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 10:39:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:Canidae (Canids)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:39, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:39, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support What beautiful image --Wilfredor (talk) 13:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks :) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 15:09, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support The hits keep coming from El Golli Mohamed. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 14:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you :) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 15:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Nice and balanced composition. But the focus is not sitting exactly on the eyes (or sharpness is not that good). Additionally the resolution is medium to low. I can not find anything outstanding here. --August (talk) 10:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Extremely beautiful canid. Wolverine XI 19:46, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Beautiful environmental portrait. – Aristeas (talk) 09:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 16:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 04:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info Flower of a Anthemis lemon. Focus stack of 44 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:23, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 17:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 02:58:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Unusual perspective, striking colours. --Tagooty (talk) 13:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 11:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:22, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support per Tagooty – and for the fascinating folds of the tarpaulin. – Aristeas (talk) 17:56, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support per Tagooty. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 17:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 22:04:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1800-1849
Info created by Scewing - uploaded by LucaLindholm - nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 22:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 22:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment Not yet opened at full size but please fix the caption ("In this 2015 discussion you requested to retouch a little bit this awesome image... and here it is, just bettered (and even better categorized on Commons). Now the images are more continous, with quite the same lvl of light. What do you think about this new version?") No idea where this text comes from -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin Oh yes, of course.
- I thought that the section “description” was to present the image here as a candidate, not the description for the image itself. XD LucaLindholm (talk) 14:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment Too big to be opened. ★ 22:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar Mmh… I could take off a little bit of quality in order to lessen the file size, and then upload it on a different file page.
- For now let’s concentrate on the img itself and the adjustments made on it. LucaLindholm (talk) 14:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support, I prefer the larger file as you can view smaller versions if it's too big, and zooming in to the full version lets you see some super cool things, like people in different areas of the panorama. -- Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 23:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yup, a little bit “sizey”, but definitely worth it. :D LucaLindholm (talk) 14:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Ever if need a massive restored version --Wilfredor (talk) 03:16, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose This is a nice concept. And I liked seeing this. This should be promoted as VI. But the image is a badly / or not even stacked panorama. Doing this today and calling in panorama would not get any support. Additionally the individual frames are in poor condition and not well restored. --August (talk) 10:15, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Well, the original was way worse. Unfortunately some little part are missing already from the original, because at the time the daguerrotype produced some black areas around the images. The frames theirselves are in the best condition possible for an image of that type and it is just that that is so good: zooming in let's you see so many particular detail that one wouldn't expect. LucaLindholm (talk) 18:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- You are right. The level of detail is outstanding. August (talk) 19:53, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Well, the original was way worse. Unfortunately some little part are missing already from the original, because at the time the daguerrotype produced some black areas around the images. The frames theirselves are in the best condition possible for an image of that type and it is just that that is so good: zooming in let's you see so many particular detail that one wouldn't expect. LucaLindholm (talk) 18:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose per August. --Milseburg (talk) 11:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Weak support While I do agree that the panorama is badly stacked, note that the image was taken more than 150 years ago. Unless there's a way better example around the same time, I think we should give it some slack. --Zzzs (talk) 17:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 13:47:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info created by Luc Viatour (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC) - uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC) - nominated by Lviatour -- Luc Viatour (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment Why is the middle of Cresent nebula brown? It doesn't look like the other images of that nebula. --C messier (talk) 14:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- In astrophotography, it's necessary to perform an RGB recomposition. Depending on the chosen color palettes, the results can vary. False colors in the Hubble style or, as here, as close as possible to natural RGB, the OIII gases dominate in blue, the Ha gases in red, and interstellar dust can vary from brown to black. Another example here (non-free image):
- [1]https://telescope.live/sites/default/files/styles/photo_main/public/2021-07/NGC%206888-202008-RC700-L%28SHO%29%20%28RGBStars%29_Nicolas%20ROLLAND_signature.jpg?itok=8LMMkb83 Luc Viatour (talk) 15:02, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I know and also the thin red and blue ribbon like structures in the middle of the nebula are what is makes it so attractive to photograph. We have also here in Commons some nice images of the Cresent Nebula, but don't appear brown in the middle. C messier (talk) 16:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Your point is well taken. I've changed the color scheme. Luc Viatour (talk) 19:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I know and also the thin red and blue ribbon like structures in the middle of the nebula are what is makes it so attractive to photograph. We have also here in Commons some nice images of the Cresent Nebula, but don't appear brown in the middle. C messier (talk) 16:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 08:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 17:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:33, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Wonderful. Your photos make me want to rewatch Carl Sagan's Cosmos. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:54, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:47, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 13:29:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish
Info created by Luc Viatour (talk) 13:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC) - uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) 13:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC) - nominated by Lviatour -- Luc Viatour (talk) 13:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 13:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment Species needs to be identified. Otherwise great image. --C messier (talk) 14:46, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I am not sufficiently expert to identify the exact species. But most likely a young Raja undulata Luc Viatour (talk) 15:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- I had a look through the aquarius page it looks a lot like a thornback skate. C messier (talk) 17:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I am not sufficiently expert to identify the exact species. But most likely a young Raja undulata Luc Viatour (talk) 15:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment Nice ventral view. This is a sea skate, order Rajiformes IMO. Little skate, maybe. Also probably juvenile and / or albino. A good ichthyologist is needed for accurate identification. -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:27, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 20:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --August (talk) 21:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Awesome --Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:16, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 14:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Fascinating. – Aristeas (talk) 17:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:47, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --BigDom (talk) 14:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 17:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 11:00:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)
Info Raspberries and blackberries from Srem, Serbia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 12:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 13:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Pictures of food under-represented here, and good focus in this one -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Poor crop and bad orientation imo. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose The former of what Shagil said. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:04, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Poor crop --Tagooty (talk) 13:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support To my eyes, it's the crop and the orientation that make this image work. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Agree it's more creative. Same style as Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dish of blueberries.jpg. In painting, artists also voluntarily crop sometimes -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:51, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support as Julesvernex2 --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose I don't understand this crop. It doesn't reach the FPC standard. After all, this is just a picture a fruits on a table. Easy shot and bad crop. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:02, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 10:26:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info Probably the most famous living filmmaker. Created and uploaded by Martin Kraft - nominated by ★ -- ★ 10:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 10:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 12:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice portrait --Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:24, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support really good portrait. --Seewolf (talk) 10:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose Yes, on the one hand a very good portrait. On the other, I see nothing that special here (apart from the fact that it's no less than Spielberg). The straight frontal look is rather uninteresting, and so is the grey background. The resolution is just okay for QI. Even this photo (also from Berlinale'23) I find more interesting, though not enough fot FP either. --A.Savin 10:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:26, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Question Shot with a camera capable of 45 Megapixel this image only has 3,2 Megapixel. What happened? Did you downscale it? Can you provide a version in full resolution? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Augustgeyler (talk • contribs)
Weak oppose No reason for the resolution to be this small. BigDom (talk) 14:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 07:04:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1930-1939
Info created by Dorothea Lange, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Info Migratory Mexican field worker's home on the edge of a frozen pea field, Imperial Valley, California.
Support -- Yann (talk) 07:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Good oldie from famous photographer. --Mile (talk) 11:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 18:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support This shelter and the girl inside, who we only notice afterwards -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:30, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:50, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Thank you for this nomination --Wilfredor (talk) 01:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice photo. Wolverine XI 19:50, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 17:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 03:43:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Cercopithecidae_(Old_World_Monkeys)
Info Portrait of a Zanzibar red colobus (Piliocolobus kirkii), Jozani Chwaka Bay National Park, Zanzibar, Tanzania. This species of red colobus monkey is endemic to Unguja, the main island of the Zanzibar Archipelago, off the coast of Tanzania. It is now classified as an endangered species and in the mid-1990s was adopted as the flagship species for conservation in Zanzibar but the population is still decreasing. Note: we have no FPs of the genus Piliocolobus. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 03:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 03:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 11:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tmv (talk) 15:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 18:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Weak support Disracting BG--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:27, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:35, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Unusual expression, exceptional detail --Tagooty (talk) 13:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:50, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --BigDom (talk) 14:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Now that's an unusual look. Wolverine XI 22:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 01:14:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
Info created by Valentine Manchon Duchesne - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment Not a huge fan of the "1 cm" mark in the corner. -- Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 01:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. @Urban Versis 32: I'm happy to propose the alternative below if preferred. But it's a useful scale, in my opinion (like here or here), otherwise you wonder what's special in this painting. It's difficult to figure out the proportions without any clue, as it could be a standard 20 by 30 cm, or larger. The scale is discreet in the background -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- That is true. It seems like most prefer the scale, however I will remain neutral on this one and support the alt. Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 23:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. @Urban Versis 32: I'm happy to propose the alternative below if preferred. But it's a useful scale, in my opinion (like here or here), otherwise you wonder what's special in this painting. It's difficult to figure out the proportions without any clue, as it could be a standard 20 by 30 cm, or larger. The scale is discreet in the background -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 07:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support. With scale info has strongest wow-facktor IMO -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:53, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support nice. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Neutral per my above comments. -- Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 23:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support I’m fine with both versions. – Aristeas (talk) 10:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Per Aristeas --Llez (talk) 10:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:11, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
Info Version without scale -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support I like this better. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support per my comments on the orig. -- Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 23:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support I’m fine with both versions. – Aristeas (talk) 10:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Per Aristeas --Llez (talk) 10:33, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:48, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 00:39:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Top as usual. ★ 00:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment Is it just me or does part of the bird have a halo effect? Maybe it's from sharpening? I don't know, I'm tired. --Zzzs (talk) 01:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Most of it was depth of field (unavoidable, especially at 600mm) that was sharpened. I reprocessed it to better resharpen it. There's now only a tiny bit left but it's very small motion blur (sometimes happens still at 1/2000s) but I think it's not significant and almost all birds in flight pictures will have it -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Now that's better.
Support --Zzzs (talk) 03:31, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Now that's better.
- Most of it was depth of field (unavoidable, especially at 600mm) that was sharpened. I reprocessed it to better resharpen it. There's now only a tiny bit left but it's very small motion blur (sometimes happens still at 1/2000s) but I think it's not significant and almost all birds in flight pictures will have it -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Great capture. Nice beak. Difficult shot of a bird in flight. Well frozen. I don't think the halo (if there is) is significant, but it's possible for me to see a very tiny line below the head and neck. There are also artifacts between the legs. Really no big deal -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! I just uploaded a new file to fix artifacts and tiny line -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- 👍Improved -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Strong support Tack sharp, bird in flight. Bravo! --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:40, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:23, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Setting new standard ? --Mile (talk) 11:02, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 12:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 13:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 13:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support awesome.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Nicely done. Wolverine XI 17:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support! --Terragio67 (talk) 21:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Great. – Aristeas (talk) 10:27, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 17:54, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support LucaLindholm (talk) 09:09, 17 August 2024 (local time)
Support --BigDom (talk) 14:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 19:54:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Vegetables (raw)
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Lovely --Wilfredor (talk) 21:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 21:50, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 22:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Soft natural light -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support per Basile, and pleasant color scheme. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 09:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 13:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 13:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 18:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support: Can you let me know which lens did you use, please? --Terragio67 (talk) 21:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Terragio67: according to exif metadata, "EF50mm f/1.4 USM" (Canon) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, this is my favorite lens. Very fast, bright and sharp. Pictures with this lens are always without CA --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:13, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:31, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Simple, yet well-taken. Wolverine XI 22:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 18:39:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Felidae_(Felids)
Info Cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice pose. Could you indicate if these are male or female? Yann (talk) 18:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Excellent expresion, for a moment I thought they were procreating --Wilfredor (talk) 18:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 18:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 19:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 19:05, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:38, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Attitudes. One is perfectly calm, the other clearly dominating -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 12:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 13:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 18:16, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment There are purple edges, especially on the white flowers at the bottom left. Fixable --Llez (talk) 10:30, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Excellent image of the fastest land animal. Wolverine XI 22:11, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 16:38:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Aurora
Info created by Stephan Sprinz - uploaded by Stephan Sprinz - nominated by Stephan Sprinz -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:38, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support This image is a composite (meteors from different exposures were added without changing their position in the sky), if you find any artifact let me know :) Also, I wasn't sure in which FP gallery this could be placed since the galleries for aurora, Astronomy (Sky) and Composite images would fit. -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:38, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support for sure --Wilfredor (talk) 17:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Great! Yann (talk) 18:44, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Wow in its magnitude. ★ 19:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 19:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Terrific image! -- Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 01:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support This is something special, what a firework of colors! -- Radomianin (talk) 06:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:16, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support A rare moment that aurora and perseids occurred simultaneously. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Perfect. It has several features in one shot: it's a rarity, the atmosphere and colours are incredible, and also very well processed picture, only few noise and posterization for an ISO value of 10,000. Picture that makes one jealous --A.Savin 09:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:25, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 12:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Great. I wonder if one should clone out the unsharp camera/tripod at the right ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 18:53, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:26, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --LucaLindholm (talk) 07:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 15:08:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Duos_(depictions_of_two_people)
Info Ford Madox Brown: The Last of England (1855) - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Thi
Support -- Thi (talk) 15:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:41, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 22:37, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Overwhelming level of detail. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Original style, excellent reproduction. – Aristeas (talk) 18:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 15:03:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Exteriors#Landscapes
Info The Girls on the Bridge by Edvard Munch - uploaded by Pimbrils, current version by 4ing - nominated by Thi
Support -- Thi (talk) 15:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:19, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 19:00, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 12:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Finally an excellent reproduction of another Munch painting – I mean besides the few omnipresent ones like ‘Scream’ and ‘Madonna’. – Aristeas (talk) 18:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:24, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 12:53:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France
Info created by Dktue - uploaded by Dktue - nominated by Dktue -- Dktue (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Dktue (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- It needs categories. Yann (talk) 18:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Zooming into the photo reveals oversharpening. -- Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 01:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Very impressive and atmospheric mountain scene. However I agree that there seems to be some oversharpening of noise; it would be nice to mitigate this. Could it be related to tonemapping? Or to problems of the raw image processor with raw images from the Fujifilm X-Trans sensor – I remember having read about that in the past. @Julesvernex2: Can you say if the special ‘worm-like’ structures in the noise are related to problems with processing the raw image files from the X-Trans sensor? – Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yup, those indeed look like Fuji's notorious worms! Adobe's default raw engine does a terrible job with X-Trans files, but there's two ways to get around it: i) Use Adobe's Enhance feature (I see this image was edited in Lightroom's mobile version, not sure if it's already available there); or ii) use another raw processor (e.g., DXO or Capture One). Dktue, if you don't have access to Enhance/DXO/Capture One, I can demosaic the raw file for you and send you a linear DNG file for editing. Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment Dear users @Dktue, Urban Versis 32, Aristeas, Yann, and Julesvernex2: If no raw file can be provided, please feel free to use the edited file available at the SwissTransfer link for an update or a derivative. I have done an appropriate, lossless denoising. It would be a pity if this nomination would be burned due to technical problems. Note as per Yann: The categories should be improved. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Radomianin, great job in reworking the JPEG, looks much better! Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Julesvernex2: Thank you very much for the explanation and the hints how to handle this problem! @Radomianin: Thank you very much for your improved version – it looks indeed much better. @Dktue: I would suggest just to upload the improved version by Radomianin – this could also help to convince more voters of the photo – and to try Julesvernex2’s hints when this problem returns with further photos. – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for editing! The enhance-details that ususally fixes the Fuji-X-trans-worms is not available on the iPad version of Lightroom. I uploaded the new version of Radomianin, thanks! --Dktue (talk) 12:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Julesvernex2: Thank you very much for the explanation and the hints how to handle this problem! @Radomianin: Thank you very much for your improved version – it looks indeed much better. @Dktue: I would suggest just to upload the improved version by Radomianin – this could also help to convince more voters of the photo – and to try Julesvernex2’s hints when this problem returns with further photos. – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Radomianin, great job in reworking the JPEG, looks much better! Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yup, those indeed look like Fuji's notorious worms! Adobe's default raw engine does a terrible job with X-Trans files, but there's two ways to get around it: i) Use Adobe's Enhance feature (I see this image was edited in Lightroom's mobile version, not sure if it's already available there); or ii) use another raw processor (e.g., DXO or Capture One). Dktue, if you don't have access to Enhance/DXO/Capture One, I can demosaic the raw file for you and send you a linear DNG file for editing. Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Very moody capture. Thanks for using the improved version :) -- Radomianin (talk) 13:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Very good now! --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:49, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 11:40:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Unusual view of the Coliseum. ★ 18:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Question Is the real Colosseo tilted like the tower in Pisa? --August (talk) 20:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- I used several verticals as a reference point (modern verticals) and the coliseum seems to be slightly tilted but not as much as the pisa tower. The Colosseum is about 40 cm (16 inches) lower on the south side than on the north.[2] Wilfredor (talk) 21:50, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment OK, as someone who has never ben there, I can not tell exactly if something is wrong here. But I can say the the building on the left is leaning to the left. --August (talk) 21:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Done Thanks Wilfredor (talk) 22:21, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support per ArionStar. -- Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 01:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Composition does not convince me. Croped cars also blown white car. Choped building on left - i would crop, it doesnt help to concetrate on vertical to Coloseum. --Mile (talk) 11:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Mile for your comment, I added a alt version based in this comment Wilfredor (talk) 03:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Alt version
Info Thanks to Mile comment, I'm adding this alt version cuting the building and the cart, IMHO look more clean centering the Colosseo importance --Wilfredor (talk) 03:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment I think its beter than above, but will stay Neutral. Still see roof and light choped. Cloning probably would help. --Mile (talk) 10:06, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment dear Mile, however, IMHO I think there is no way to take a street photo without cutting off a building or a car at some point. Wilfredor (talk) 12:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment Wilfredor I tried, and something like this , Coloseum must be more in sight, so more light and roand bellow less light, also removed roof, luster of left. You have space to sharpen it, so i did some. This was quick mode. I would enlight Coloseum even more. --Mile (talk) 15:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it's right to remove permanent landscape elements like light poles. Wilfredor (talk) 15:26, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 04:55:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:55, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:55, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support The lighting makes it special for me. Excellent technical quality of the Leica. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Somehow. Tried BW and also one with LOW saturation and like them much more. I would put it in BW. --Mile (talk) 11:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Although I'd have fixed the perspective Poco a poco (talk) 13:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support The light. – Aristeas (talk) 18:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 17:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:46, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose I don't understand the angle of view, the slanted base or the sharply plunging lines. --Stepro (talk) 21:16, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 04:48:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Hamburg
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Soft color contrast of sunny yellow and cool blue, compositionally rounded off by two horizontal contrails in the sky. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Specially for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 18:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 18:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 17:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 03:08:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:04, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Strong support Well frozen at high speed, striking view with the wet mud -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support
Question is he playing or running away from a predator? --Wilfredor (talk) 12:56, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- He was playing -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- How do you know it's a he? Wolverine XI 14:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- English is not my first langage, I should have written "it" Giles Laurent (talk) 18:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- How do you know it's a he? Wolverine XI 14:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- He was playing -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Strong support Excellent stop action, you can see how thick the mud is, the contrast of the Wildebeest and the grassland adds to the depth. Well composed, well executed. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 13:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:18, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:50, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support per Needsmoreritalin. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:22, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 10:27, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Muddy...Wolverine XI 14:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support per Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 18:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 18:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:21, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Ambras Castle, from Innsbruck.jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2024 at 22:41:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Austria
Info all by -- Wilfredor (talk) 22:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Light and architecture… ★ 23:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Love the contrast between the roof and columns & floor. -- Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 01:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Symmetrical beauty. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 07:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 10:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 18:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support A very impressive room; effective light and composition. – Aristeas (talk) 18:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- In person this is more impressive than that photo Wilfredor (talk) 04:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --BigDom (talk) 14:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2024 at 22:29:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Actitis
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:29, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:29, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Automatic support for El Golli Mohamed aka the King of Tunisia. ★ 23:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you :) lol El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:15, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:01, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 10:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:44, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 11:16, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 08:26, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Lac Gentau (6).jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2024 at 15:47:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Pyrénées-Atlantiques
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:32, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 00:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:35, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice view over the lake to the mountain ranges in the mist. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Lac Bersau (3).jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2024 at 15:42:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Pyrénées-Atlantiques
Info continuation of the Lacs d'Ayous story. All by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:42, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:42, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:31, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 00:50, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:39, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 18:37, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2024 at 18:54:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits
Info uploaded by Pixel8tor - nominated by Kasir -- Kasir (talk) 18:54, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Kasir (talk) 18:54, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Question WB done from File:Maria Alexandrovna by Winterhalter (1857, Hermitage) 2.jpg. Should we remove the yellowish color from the paintings? ?. I'm not saying it's bad, it's just a question, could it have been the yellow light on the paint or the paint itself being yellow? --Wilfredor (talk) 19:46, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ask yourself, if we don't remove the patina on an FP of this, why should we remove it from other paintings? Restauration work on oil paintings should be done by a professional conservator-restorer to reveal the original colors, not by Photoshop. --Cart (talk) 20:08, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your clarification. I confess that I recently went to see the Mona Lisa and I confess that I found a painting with the "original" or restored colors, very different from the image I had of the Mona Lisa for so many years. It left me with a taste of falseness in my mouth, and all the paintings seemed bluish. I still have that feeling of having seen a fake Mona Lisa, even though I know it was the original. In some old objects such as coins, restoring them reduces their value because during the restoration process the passage of time is removed and sometimes implies destruction of something. I remember having taken some other photos (not in the Louvre) where the light was yellow and direct on the painting, which made the painting turn yellowish and with a reflection that I had to carefully remove in post-production, but it was not easy to find a reference point for the true color without removing the natural coloring of the painting. Wilfredor (talk) 22:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ask yourself, if we don't remove the patina on an FP of this, why should we remove it from other paintings? Restauration work on oil paintings should be done by a professional conservator-restorer to reveal the original colors, not by Photoshop. --Cart (talk) 20:08, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 10:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but more editing is needed to bring this painting to FP standards. Wolverine XI 19:28, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Wolverine XI: What editing? There needs to be a very serious reason to edit a picture of a painting by a GLAM. Yann (talk) 18:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:29, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Gnosis (talk) 19:50, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 00:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2024 at 15:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info Pediment of the East Gopura Shiva Nataraj depicting Shiva dancing at Banteay Srei Srei, Siem Reap, Cambodia created by
all by me - nominated by Pierre André Leclercq -- Pierre André (talk) 15:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC)I withdraw my nomination -- Pierre André (talk) 15:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:28, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 13:52, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment Because the photo shows the relief only, I have taken the liberty to change the gallery link from the “Religious buildings” gallery to the “Reliefs” gallery where similar FPs reside. – Aristeas (talk) 15:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:51, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Interesting motif but the level of detail isn't great, the crop is a bit questionable and at the top right corner there is an out of focus object, probably a finger. --C messier (talk) 13:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. For information regarding a blurry object in the upper right corner, it is not a finger but the shadow cast by the relief. Please look at the portal from which the relief is extracted File:Cambodge Banteay Srei Temple (5).jpg. Best regards Pierre André (talk) 17:00, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with C messier, sorry. This blurry spot really looks like a finger or an intrusive object, more than a "shadow cast". There is nothing similar in other pictures of the same relief (example). The other image linked above is the same (uncropped) photo, according to the metadata (taken at the same time exactly), so it is logical that the spot is present on it too. And it was 10 years ago -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I agree, Thanks for the advices.--Pierre André (talk) 08:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Alexander Gardner by James Gardner - 1863.jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 22:50:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1860-1869
Info created by James Gardner - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:50, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:50, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment The paper and the picture yellowed quite a lot, and you could fix that. Yann (talk) 22:55, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's just sepia. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:57, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- IMO this is sepia: File:Alexander Gardner by James Gardner - 1863, edit.jpg. Yann (talk) 20:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- That seems a little pale, and maybe off-colour. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- IMO this is sepia: File:Alexander Gardner by James Gardner - 1863, edit.jpg. Yann (talk) 20:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's just sepia. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:57, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice portrait, excellent restauration. – Aristeas (talk) 17:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose A nearly perfect face and legs blurred into fog in the same photo. JukoFF (talk) 20:07, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment That’s just the depth of field; portrait photographers have always worked with limited DoF, originally just for technical, but soon also for aesthetic reasons. In this photo you can even see that the photographer used the lens tilt potential of his view camera in order to tilt (sic) the focal plane – thanks to that technique not only the face is in focus, but the hands and the frontmost (the left) leg are almost in focus, too. On the other hand the right leg and the left and right chair legs are clearly out of focus because the tilted focal plane is in front of them. That’s unavoidable. – Today many portrait photographers strive for an extremely small depth of field, using apertures like ƒ/1.2, so that only the pupil of one of the eyes is sharp. In the light of this trend we should not criticize portrait photographs from the 1860s for not using focus stacking, should we? – Aristeas (talk) 08:05, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:01, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 08:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Vietnam peace agreement signing, 27580141, new.jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 22:33:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1970-1979
Info created by Robert LeRoy Knudsen, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Info US Secretary of State William Rogers Signing the Paris Peace Accords, 27 January 1973, at Hotel Majestic (now The Peninsula Paris). FP on English Wikipedia.
Support -- Yann (talk) 22:33, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 08:41, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Manggadua (talk) 14:46, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Support
- @Manggadua: You do not meet the voting requirements (at least 50 edits). Yann (talk) 14:50, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment It is noticeably tilted and a bit noisy. --C messier (talk) 17:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- Noise is because it is scanned from an argentic print or slide. Interior picture taken without a flash. Yann (talk) 20:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Excessive noise and bad composition. Wolverine XI 19:23, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Grain in photography is more than an imperfection; it’s part of the texture that brings the image to life. Unlike digital noise, which distorts with color blotches, grain adds an organic and authentic feel that emotionally connects with the history of photography. It’s visible even in the brightest areas, distributing evenly and creating a visual aesthetic that enriches the image rather than degrading it. While it was once something to minimize, today it is valued for its ability to add depth and character. Wilfredor (talk) 20:04, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Historic moment; good quality for the time and the difficult circumstances (see Yann’s comment); and the available light gives it a cinematic touch. – Aristeas (talk) 08:38, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 13:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Ordinary historical picture. Why FP? Very grainy, bad light. Dark and poor contrasts. Tilted. Grain in analog photography is like noise in numeric pictures: synonym of bad quality. The head of the foreground is out of focus and seen from behind unappealing, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The original version has better contrast and low tones and more balanced colour contrast. --August (talk) 10:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Wed 14 Aug → Mon 19 Aug Thu 15 Aug → Tue 20 Aug Fri 16 Aug → Wed 21 Aug Sat 17 Aug → Thu 22 Aug Sun 18 Aug → Fri 23 Aug Mon 19 Aug → Sat 24 Aug
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sat 10 Aug → Mon 19 Aug Sun 11 Aug → Tue 20 Aug Mon 12 Aug → Wed 21 Aug Tue 13 Aug → Thu 22 Aug Wed 14 Aug → Fri 23 Aug Thu 15 Aug → Sat 24 Aug Fri 16 Aug → Sun 25 Aug Sat 17 Aug → Mon 26 Aug Sun 18 Aug → Tue 27 Aug Mon 19 Aug → Wed 28 Aug
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.